Wednesday, February 21, 2007
VF-Engineering Motor Mounts
I purchased these mounts as a birthday gift for myself :-) While expensive (~$200 a piece), they're beautifully crafted and constructed of 6061 billet aluminum which makes them extremely stong. The polyurethane bushings included restrict engine movement and allow a visceral connection of the engine to the chassis. Less deflection between shifts also makes for smoother gear changes than with the stock mounts. Also, the stock rubber mounts promote a phenomenon called "wheel hop" which is the uncontrolled rebounding of the suspension / engine when trying to put down more power than the tires can handle. With the APR SII beta program, wheel hop is a common reality and requires delicate modulation of the throttle in 1st through 3rd gears to avoid wheel hop.
I have been running the Neuspeed torque insert and Powerflex front bushing (PN: PFR85-505) for the past four months. While both offer significant improvement over stock, there is still a high level of driveline slop present. I hope that with the VF mounts, the majority of the slop in the drivetrain will be removed at little NVH expense. I will report back when these mounts are installed and provide an update.
Although these mounts were sourced individually through different vendors, my best purchasing experience was through Nick Wagner of NAMotorsports.net
VF Transmission Mount: VFA06-04
VF Engine Mount: VFA06-03
VF Pendulum Mount: VFA06-01
Labels:
engine mounts,
performance,
VF engineering,
VF mounts
Friday, February 16, 2007
OEM A3 S-line shift knob
I purchased this knob from angryrican66 on fourtitude, after he had upgraded to the S3 shift knob. Initially I was hesitant to purchase this knob due to its "bling" factor, but after seeing it on the fourtitude.com Project S4, I was convinced it would look good in the A3.
This knob normally retails for $248.
Installation of this knob was fairly easy. Simply open the ashtray and remove the insert. Pull up on the front base of the shift trim and it will pull straight up. Undo the clips along the shift boot and separate the trim from the boot. Pull the boot over the top of the knob and cut off the one-time use clamp. The knob should pull straight up and can be removed. I ended up using a zip-tie to secure the shift knob and it feels just as sturdy as the old OEM one.
Being aluminum, the knob certainly gets cold in the mornings, but overall I'm liking the feel. The added weight has smoothed out shifts significantly, and no longer do I get any kickback from the transmission.
Here is a pic installed:
The picture doesn't do the knob any justice as it looks much better in person. I think I'll be keeping this for awhile and putting my OEM leather knob for sale.
This knob normally retails for $248.
Installation of this knob was fairly easy. Simply open the ashtray and remove the insert. Pull up on the front base of the shift trim and it will pull straight up. Undo the clips along the shift boot and separate the trim from the boot. Pull the boot over the top of the knob and cut off the one-time use clamp. The knob should pull straight up and can be removed. I ended up using a zip-tie to secure the shift knob and it feels just as sturdy as the old OEM one.
Being aluminum, the knob certainly gets cold in the mornings, but overall I'm liking the feel. The added weight has smoothed out shifts significantly, and no longer do I get any kickback from the transmission.
Here is a pic installed:
The picture doesn't do the knob any justice as it looks much better in person. I think I'll be keeping this for awhile and putting my OEM leather knob for sale.
Swaybar comparisons (Neuspeed 25mm vs others)
I recently switched from the H&R 22mm swaybar to the Neuspeed 25mm. While the H&R certainly reduced understeer, it left me wanting more. A major downside of the H&R was that I noticed that on full-stiff, the ride tended to be harsh over bumps. The harshness of the H&R did not correlate with the amount of body-roll reduction, as there was still plenty of roll through the corners. These observations were done on the OEM stock sport suspension, so I believed that when I switched to the Vogtland adjustable coilovers, I would harness much more of the swaybar's potential.
I was wrong.
While the coilovers certainly helped with the overall handling, the harshness and inherent understeer and body roll remained. As a test, I removed the H&R 22mm and returned the car to stock. Shockingly enough, the difference between the H&R 22mm and the stock bar was much less than what I felt when on the stock suspension. I can probably attribute this to the aftermarket suspension running higher spring rates and dampening than stock. Upon removal of the H&R 22mm, I also stumbled upon another flaw in its design. While the maintenance-free dry bushings are certainly a selling point, their performance in real-life conditions is poor. After only running the bar for about 8 months, the powdercoat underneath the bushing had rusted. I was not pleased.
Having said this, I opted to give the Neuspeed 25mm swaybar a try. I ordered it from NAMotorsports.net and it dropshipped directly from Neuspeed themselves. The Neuspeed offers four improvements over the H&R: diameter, weight, bushing size & material, and upgraded brackets
First of all, the obvious difference is in the diameter of the bars. The H&R is a 22mm (solid), stock is 20.5mm (hollow), and the Neuspeed is 25mm (hollow). I believe that this directly corresponds to the "harshness" that I was referring to before. The different "stiffness" settings are adjusted on the bars by positioning the sway links more inwards on the bar, making the total bar "shorter" and thus increasing the "stiffness". Since the H&R 22mm was set on full stiffness, the bar was forced to twist more in order to produce the same range of motion. The Neuspeed 25mm did not suffer in this case, and could undergo the same range of motion as stock and still reduce body roll more than the H&R 22mm, because of the improved stiffness afforded to it via the larger diameter.
H&R 22mm, OEM 20.5mm, Neuspeed 25mm
Although the Neuspeed was significantly larger than the H&R 22mm, it actually felt lighter than the H&R. I'm going off of memory here, but IIRC, the H&R 22 weighed 11lbs, the Neuspeed 9 lbs, and OEM 5 lbs. The differences in weight are negligible but I suppose every little bit counts.
The Neuspeed also provided improvements over the H&R & stock in terms of bushing size and material. When measured, the Neuspeed bushing was 4.5cm across in length, when both the H&R and stock measured 3cm across. The increased width of the bushings should theoretically improve the actual usable force and response of the bar. The polyurethane in the Neuspeed was also of higher durometer (stiffer) than the H&R or stock. Unlike the others, the Neuspeed bushing requires greasing. In order to extend grease longevity, the Neuspeed bushings are grooved in order to retain the grease. The grease should serve to improve corrosion resistance over that of stock & H&R at the contact points, although this hasn't been verified just yet.
Lastly, Neuspeed supplies a superior sway bracket to that of stock. I mentioned earlier that the H&R bar suffered from rusting underneath the dry bushing. I believe part of this has to do with the fact that the H&R reuses the stock sway brackets. The H&R bushings almost seem too small for the bar once everything is tightened, and most likely causes binding on a fresh install. As the bar is "broken in" the teflon mesh bonded to the soft poly, wears away and also takes along some of the bar's powdercoat finish. Eventually the poly compresses enough and the bar can move fluidly. On the other hand, the supplied Neuspeed brackets were a perfect fit with their poly bushings. The fitment to the stock mounting points was perfect and didn't cause the bar to bind with the bushings. If anything, it was very secure. I must note that since I received the bar, Neuspeed has switched to a different bushing, for the purpose of reusing the stock sway bracket. I can assume that this was done only for cost-purposes, as it is two fewer pieces that need to be manufactured and powdercoated. The price on the bars has remained the same, despite the cost-cutting measure. I greatly prefer the Neuspeed brackets as they are powdercoated, and do not suffer from corrosion like the stock brackets.
Overall, I felt as if the switch from H&R to Neuspeed was worth it. The car rolls less, response is significantly improved, yet the ride is more comfortable than that of the H&R 22mm. So far, I have left the Neuspeed at full soft. I have yet to try the stiffer settings of the Neuspeed, mostly due to poor roads in New York. At this point, I do not see a need in increasing the stiffness of the rear. As with any FWD vehicle, the A3 still understeers, but push the steering wheel a bit more and I am rewarded with a relatively neutral feel, easily bringing the rear around if needed.
As mentioned earlier, I purchased this bar from NAMotorsports. I could not be any happier with the level of customer service I received from them with this purchase.
OEM Audi A3 trunk mat that fits!!!
As many of you may know, I've had multiple trunk mats both OEM and aftermarket. The original 8P5-061-180 mat did not fit correctly as it was designed for the european FWD A3, which does not have the 4" lift present in the US trunk. I informed AoA of this error and they eventually released a new trunk mat, 8P5-061-181, which was a better fit, but still suffered from similar fitment issues. I then sought out Lloyd's mats, and had them make me a custom trunk mat out of their Ultimat material. Color match was excellent as well as fit and finish, but I frankly wanted a rubber mat that I could handle any snow-laden gear I throw in the trunk.
Audi has now released a new mat with the part number: ZAW380510. The mat retails for $80, and comes with a set of retaining blocks. Although it appears to be carpeted, it is a thin carpet overlaid on a plastic base. The carpet itself is close to a berber-style carpet in terms of feel and durability. The raised edges of the mat are a nice touch, but do not interfere with the cargo net hooks. Overall I am completely satisfied with this mat as it looks great and is very functional.
Audi has now released a new mat with the part number: ZAW380510. The mat retails for $80, and comes with a set of retaining blocks. Although it appears to be carpeted, it is a thin carpet overlaid on a plastic base. The carpet itself is close to a berber-style carpet in terms of feel and durability. The raised edges of the mat are a nice touch, but do not interfere with the cargo net hooks. Overall I am completely satisfied with this mat as it looks great and is very functional.
Thursday, February 1, 2007
2.0t Used Oil Analysis
I opted to do oil analysis through blackstone labs to establish a proper oil change interval suited for my driving style and conditions. My first UOA was done in Sept 2006, using Castrol 0w30 (aka "GC"). While iron wear was relatively high for my tastes the oil stayed mostly in grade despite significant fuel dilution.
The next oil analysis I did was in Jan of 2007, using the newly reformulated Amsoil 5w40 AFL. Wear improved significantly, but flashpoint and viscosity suffered much more than with the GC. Although fuel dilution increased from the last sample, I do not believe it is an issue, based on the amount of time I let the car idle during the winter.
Since this last oil change, I have switched back to the Green GC based on the better PAO/Ester basestock. The thinner weight 0w30 GC should improve overall MPG as well as reduce the amount of time it will take to bring the oil up to temperature.
The next oil analysis I did was in Jan of 2007, using the newly reformulated Amsoil 5w40 AFL. Wear improved significantly, but flashpoint and viscosity suffered much more than with the GC. Although fuel dilution increased from the last sample, I do not believe it is an issue, based on the amount of time I let the car idle during the winter.
Since this last oil change, I have switched back to the Green GC based on the better PAO/Ester basestock. The thinner weight 0w30 GC should improve overall MPG as well as reduce the amount of time it will take to bring the oil up to temperature.
Carbonio 2.0t Intake
I purchased this intake during the summer of 2006 and have put approximately 6k miles on it so far. Unlike the other intake options, the Carbonio retains the stock engine cover and improves primarily on the stock inlet.
The stock inlet does not feed air directly to the engine. Instead of channeling air from the grille directly to the filter, it merely flows a path of air into the engine bay, from which the engine draws from.
This is a fairly inefficient design which Carbonio has significantly improved on. The Carbonio intake comprises of a carbon fiber inlet with a thermal heat barrier intergrated in the weave. In addition, they provide a Pipercross oil-less triple stage foam filter to improve on the stock paper filter. The pipercross filter provides excellent filtration as I haven't see any increase in aluminum wear or silicon particles in used oil analysis.
One major concern I had with the Carbonio was regarding the possiblity of hydrolock, since the carbonio inlet is completely sealed. There are a set of water drainage holes on the bottom of the airbox and the air still needs to flow through the filter, thus reducing the possiblity of hydrolock. So far, I have driven with the intake on in very rainy wet conditions as well as snow and have not encountered any issues.
Overall the intake improved throttle response significantly, which I mostly attribute to the low-restriction foam filter. Where I notice impressive gains is in the 4k to 6krpm range. The inlet is designed to provide ram-air-like effects as speed increases due to its smooth transition from a large volume of air into the smaller inlet to the engine cover. I believe this inlet design is responsible for the mid to upper RPM gains I felt. In order to test this hypothesis, I ran the stock inlet for about a month with the pipercross filter. When switching back to the Carbonio inlet, I noticed the mid-to-upper RPM gains came back.
Another benefit of the Carbonio is that it maintains the stock MAF profile and flow straightener. While other "filter-on-a-stick" intakes claim to have a similar cross-section to that of stock, the MAF sensor still sits in the housing differently than how it was designed to read. Also, all the tubular intakes are devoid of the flow straighter, whose absence can skew MAF readings and impact engine performance negatively. While the extent to which these two elements impact performance has not been thoroughly researched by me, I opted for the safer route and left both the MAF profile and flow straightener in it's stock form.
In addition to its impressive performance gains, the Carbonio is also a beautiful sight to see. The intricate mold fit perfectly in the stock position. While carbon fiber is difficult to mold with exacting precision, Carbonio has managed to sculpt their intake so that it is a seamless install, maintaining proper clearance for the hood cable and utilizing both stock attachment screws. Although other people have had some issues, my Carbonio has not hazed, yellowed or turned green. The weave is perfect and the resin has been resiliant against scratches and road grime.
I purchased the Carbonio from Keith Lucas at APR. Despite having to wait a month for the intake to come off of backorder, I think it was worth every penny.
www.goapr.com
Monday, January 1, 2007
Part Numbers List
Suspension/Brake
Rotor set screw (T-30): N 106 483 01
Front brake rotor (312x25mm): 1k0 615 301 AA
Rear brake rotor (286x12mm): 1k0 615 601 M
Rear swaybar endlink: 1K0 505 465 K
Rear swaybar slider bolt: WHT 000 226
Common 16mm nut: N 102 861 02
Rear shock tower mounting bolts (2x each side): N 906 484 01
Pendulum-to-subframe bolt: N 105 580 01
Swaybar bracket bolts (4x): N 106 447 01
Body
Hood latch assembly: 8P0 823 509 D
Hood latch bolts (T-30): N 910 481 01
Air intake side bolts (2xT-20): N 909 868 02
Splash Guard mounting bolts (8x): N 909 747 01
Drivetrain
2.0t oil filter: 06D 115 562
Transmission drain/fill plug: N 909 178 01
Transmission drain/fill plug washer: N 043 809 2
2.0t diverter valve: 06F 145 710 C
Diverter valve bolts (3x): N 104 592 01
PCV breather hose: 06F 103 221 F
PCV valve cover assembly: 06F 129 101 G
PCV valve cover gasket: 06F 103 483 E
PCV valve cover to turbo hose: 06F 103 215 A
PCV tube to turbo metal gasket: 06F 145 757 F
2.0T coilpack: 07K 905 715 C
Stock exhaust clamp: 1K0 253 141 C
Copper turbo-downpipe nuts: N 102 861 08
Rotor set screw (T-30): N 106 483 01
Front brake rotor (312x25mm): 1k0 615 301 AA
Rear brake rotor (286x12mm): 1k0 615 601 M
Rear swaybar endlink: 1K0 505 465 K
Rear swaybar slider bolt: WHT 000 226
Common 16mm nut: N 102 861 02
Rear shock tower mounting bolts (2x each side): N 906 484 01
Pendulum-to-subframe bolt: N 105 580 01
Swaybar bracket bolts (4x): N 106 447 01
Body
Hood latch assembly: 8P0 823 509 D
Hood latch bolts (T-30): N 910 481 01
Air intake side bolts (2xT-20): N 909 868 02
Splash Guard mounting bolts (8x): N 909 747 01
Drivetrain
2.0t oil filter: 06D 115 562
Transmission drain/fill plug: N 909 178 01
Transmission drain/fill plug washer: N 043 809 2
2.0t diverter valve: 06F 145 710 C
Diverter valve bolts (3x): N 104 592 01
PCV breather hose: 06F 103 221 F
PCV valve cover assembly: 06F 129 101 G
PCV valve cover gasket: 06F 103 483 E
PCV valve cover to turbo hose: 06F 103 215 A
PCV tube to turbo metal gasket: 06F 145 757 F
2.0T coilpack: 07K 905 715 C
Stock exhaust clamp: 1K0 253 141 C
Copper turbo-downpipe nuts: N 102 861 08
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)